mirror of
https://github.com/c-cube/sidekick.git
synced 2025-12-09 04:35:35 -05:00
refactor: remove history in conflict resolution; remove simpls
no need to simplify reasons anymore, we rely on DRUP for that.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f86498b386
commit
10dca21f59
1 changed files with 15 additions and 81 deletions
|
|
@ -884,13 +884,11 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
- true literals (maybe makes the clause trivial if the lit is proved true at level 0)
|
||||
- unassigned literals, yet to be decided
|
||||
- false literals (not suitable to watch, those at level 0 can be removed from the clause)
|
||||
|
||||
Clauses that propagated false lits are remembered to reconstruct resolution proofs.
|
||||
*)
|
||||
let partition store atoms : atom list * clause list =
|
||||
let rec partition_aux trues unassigned falses history i =
|
||||
let partition store atoms : atom list =
|
||||
let rec partition_aux trues unassigned falses i =
|
||||
if i >= Array.length atoms then (
|
||||
trues @ unassigned @ falses, history
|
||||
trues @ unassigned @ falses
|
||||
) else (
|
||||
let a = atoms.(i) in
|
||||
if Atom.is_true store a then (
|
||||
|
|
@ -899,13 +897,13 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
raise_notrace Trivial (* Atom var true at level 0 gives a trivially true clause *)
|
||||
else
|
||||
(a :: trues) @ unassigned @ falses @
|
||||
(arr_to_list atoms (i + 1)), history
|
||||
(arr_to_list atoms (i + 1))
|
||||
) else if Atom.is_false store a then (
|
||||
let l = Atom.level store a in
|
||||
if l = 0 then (
|
||||
match Atom.reason store a with
|
||||
| Some (Bcp cl | Bcp_lazy (lazy cl)) ->
|
||||
partition_aux trues unassigned falses (cl :: history) (i + 1)
|
||||
| Some (Bcp _ | Bcp_lazy (lazy _)) ->
|
||||
partition_aux trues unassigned falses (i + 1)
|
||||
(* Atom var false at level 0 can be eliminated from the clause,
|
||||
but we need to kepp in mind that we used another clause to simplify it. *)
|
||||
(* TODO: get a proof of the propagation. *)
|
||||
|
|
@ -913,14 +911,14 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
(* The var must have a reason, and it cannot be a decision/assumption,
|
||||
since its level is 0. *)
|
||||
) else (
|
||||
partition_aux trues unassigned (a::falses) history (i + 1)
|
||||
partition_aux trues unassigned (a::falses) (i + 1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
) else (
|
||||
partition_aux trues (a::unassigned) falses history (i + 1)
|
||||
partition_aux trues (a::unassigned) falses (i + 1)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
in
|
||||
partition_aux [] [] [] [] 0
|
||||
partition_aux [] [] [] 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
(* Making a decision.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1028,45 +1026,6 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
in
|
||||
raise (E_unsat us)
|
||||
|
||||
(* TODO: remove when we use DRUP *)
|
||||
(* Simplification of boolean propagation reasons.
|
||||
When doing boolean propagation *at level 0*, it can happen
|
||||
that the clause cl, which propagates a lit, also contains
|
||||
other lits, but has been simplified. in which case, we
|
||||
need to rebuild a clause with correct history, in order to
|
||||
be able to build a correct proof at the end of proof search. *)
|
||||
let simpl_reason (self:t) (r:reason) : reason =
|
||||
match r with
|
||||
| (Bcp cl | Bcp_lazy (lazy cl)) as r ->
|
||||
let l, history = partition self.store (Clause.atoms_a self.store cl) in
|
||||
begin match l with
|
||||
| [_] ->
|
||||
if history = [] then (
|
||||
(* no simplification has been done, so [cl] is actually a clause with only
|
||||
[a], so it is a valid reason for propagating [a]. *)
|
||||
r
|
||||
) else (
|
||||
(* Clauses in [history] have been used to simplify [cl] into a clause [tmp_cl]
|
||||
with only one lit (which is [a]). So we explicitly create that clause
|
||||
and set it as the cause for the propagation of [a], that way we can
|
||||
rebuild the whole resolution tree when we want to prove [a]. *)
|
||||
let removable = Clause.removable self.store cl in
|
||||
let c' = Clause.make_l self.store ~removable l in
|
||||
Log.debugf 3
|
||||
(fun k -> k "(@[<hv>sat.simplified-reason@ %a@ %a@])"
|
||||
(Clause.debug self.store) cl (Clause.debug self.store) c');
|
||||
Bcp c'
|
||||
)
|
||||
| _ ->
|
||||
Log.debugf 0
|
||||
(fun k ->
|
||||
k "(@[<v2>sat.simplify-reason.failed@ :at %a@ %a@]"
|
||||
(Vec.pp ~sep:"" (Atom.debug self.store)) (Vec.of_list l)
|
||||
(Clause.debug self.store) cl);
|
||||
assert false
|
||||
end
|
||||
| Decision as r -> r
|
||||
|
||||
(* Boolean propagation.
|
||||
Wrapper function for adding a new propagated lit. *)
|
||||
let enqueue_bool (self:t) a ~level:lvl reason : unit =
|
||||
|
|
@ -1079,10 +1038,6 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
assert (not (Atom.is_true store a) &&
|
||||
Atom.level store a < 0 &&
|
||||
Atom.reason store a == None && lvl >= 0);
|
||||
let reason =
|
||||
if lvl > 0 then reason
|
||||
else simpl_reason self reason
|
||||
in
|
||||
Atom.set_is_true store a true;
|
||||
Var.set_level store (Atom.var a) lvl;
|
||||
Var.set_reason store (Atom.var a) (Some reason);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1144,15 +1099,10 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
(* result of conflict analysis, containing the learnt clause and some
|
||||
additional info.
|
||||
|
||||
invariant: cr_history's order matters, as its head is later used
|
||||
during pop operations to determine the origin of a clause/conflict
|
||||
(boolean conflict i.e hypothesis, or theory lemma) *)
|
||||
additional info. *)
|
||||
type conflict_res = {
|
||||
cr_backtrack_lvl : int; (* level to backtrack to *)
|
||||
cr_learnt: atom array; (* lemma learnt from conflict *)
|
||||
cr_history: clause array; (* justification *)
|
||||
cr_is_uip: bool; (* conflict is UIP? *)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1164,8 +1114,6 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
Vec.clear to_unmark;
|
||||
let learnt = self.temp_atom_vec in
|
||||
Vec.clear learnt;
|
||||
let history = self.temp_clause_vec in
|
||||
Vec.clear history;
|
||||
|
||||
(* loop variables *)
|
||||
let pathC = ref 0 in
|
||||
|
|
@ -1199,7 +1147,6 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
if Clause.removable store clause then (
|
||||
clause_bump_activity self clause;
|
||||
);
|
||||
Vec.push history clause;
|
||||
(* visit the current predecessors *)
|
||||
let atoms = Clause.atoms_a store clause in
|
||||
for j = 0 to Array.length atoms - 1 do
|
||||
|
|
@ -1209,10 +1156,6 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
Atom.level store q >= 0); (* unsure? *)
|
||||
if Atom.level store q <= 0 then (
|
||||
assert (Atom.is_false store q);
|
||||
match Atom.reason store q with
|
||||
| Some (Bcp cl | Bcp_lazy (lazy cl)) ->
|
||||
Vec.push history cl
|
||||
| Some Decision | None -> assert false
|
||||
);
|
||||
if not (Var.marked store (Atom.var q)) then (
|
||||
Var.mark store (Atom.var q);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1264,14 +1207,10 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
Vec.clear learnt;
|
||||
Array.sort (fun p q -> compare (Atom.level store q) (Atom.level store p)) cr_learnt;
|
||||
|
||||
let cr_history = Vec.to_array history in
|
||||
Vec.clear history;
|
||||
|
||||
(* put_high_level_atoms_first a; *)
|
||||
let level, is_uip = backtrack_lvl self cr_learnt in
|
||||
{ cr_backtrack_lvl = level;
|
||||
cr_learnt;
|
||||
cr_history;
|
||||
cr_is_uip = is_uip;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1354,17 +1293,12 @@ module Make(Plugin : PLUGIN)
|
|||
try
|
||||
let c = eliminate_duplicates store init in
|
||||
Log.debugf 30 (fun k -> k "(@[sat.dups-removed@ %a@])" (Clause.debug store) c);
|
||||
let atoms, history = partition store (Clause.atoms_a store c) in
|
||||
let atoms = partition store (Clause.atoms_a store c) in
|
||||
let clause =
|
||||
if history = [] then (
|
||||
(* just update order of atoms *)
|
||||
let c_atoms = Clause.atoms_a store c in
|
||||
List.iteri (fun i a -> c_atoms.(i) <- a) atoms;
|
||||
c
|
||||
) else (
|
||||
let removable = Clause.removable store c in
|
||||
Clause.make_l store ~removable atoms
|
||||
)
|
||||
(* just update order of atoms *)
|
||||
let c_atoms = Clause.atoms_a store c in
|
||||
List.iteri (fun i a -> c_atoms.(i) <- a) atoms;
|
||||
c
|
||||
in
|
||||
assert (Clause.removable store clause = Clause.removable store init);
|
||||
Log.debugf 5 (fun k->k "(@[sat.new-clause@ @[<hov>%a@]@])" (Clause.debug store) clause);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue