Res module adapted to accomodate puush/pop

solver/internal.ml

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ module Make (L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S)
     ul_th_env : Th.level; (* Theory state at level 0 *)
     ul_clauses : int; (* number of clauses *)
     ul_learnt : int; (* number of learnt clauses *)
+    ul_proof_lvl : int; (* push/pop index for Res module *)
   }
 
   (* Singleton type containing the current state *)
@@ -128,6 +129,7 @@ module Make (L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S)
         ul_learnt = 0;
         ul_clauses = 0;
         ul_th_env = Th.dummy;
+        ul_proof_lvl = -1;
       };
     qhead = 0;
     simpDB_assigns = -1;
@@ -968,7 +970,8 @@ module Make (L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S)
     in
     let ul_clauses = Vec.size env.clauses in
     let ul_learnt = Vec.size env.learnts in
-    Vec.push env.user_levels {ul_trail; ul_th_env; ul_clauses;ul_learnt};
+    let ul_proof_lvl = Proof.push () in
+    Vec.push env.user_levels {ul_trail; ul_th_env; ul_clauses; ul_learnt; ul_proof_lvl;};
     res
 
   (* Backtrack to decision_level 0, with trail_lim && theory env specified *)
@@ -1014,7 +1017,7 @@ module Make (L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S)
     (* It is quite hard to check wether unsat status can be kept, so in doubt, we remove it *)
     env.is_unsat <- false;
 
-    (* Backtrack to the right level *)
+    (* Backtrack to the level 0 with appropriate settings *)
     reset_until l ul.ul_trail ul.ul_th_env;
 
     (* Clear hypothesis not valid anymore *)
@@ -1025,6 +1028,9 @@ module Make (L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S)
     done;
     Vec.shrink env.clauses (Vec.size env.clauses - ul.ul_clauses);
 
+    (* Backtrack the Proof module *)
+    Proof.pop ul.ul_proof_lvl;
+
     (* Refresh the known tautologies simplified because of clauses that have been removed *)
     let s = Stack.create () in
     let new_sz = ref ul.ul_learnt in

solver/res.ml

@@ -40,7 +40,18 @@ module Make(L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S) = struct
       let hash = hash_cl
       let equal = equal_cl
     end)
-  let proof : node H.t = H.create 1007;;
+  let proof : node H.t ref = ref (H.create 1007);;
+
+  let push_stack = Vec.make 0 (H.create 0)
+
+  let push () =
+    let res = Vec.size push_stack in
+    Vec.push push_stack (H.copy !proof);
+    res
+
+  let pop i =
+    proof := Vec.get push_stack i;
+    Vec.shrink push_stack (Vec.size push_stack - i)
 
   (* Misc functions *)
   let equal_atoms a b = St.(a.aid) = St.(b.aid)
@@ -96,16 +107,16 @@ module Make(L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S) = struct
   let print_clause fmt c = print_cl fmt (to_list c)
 
   (* Adding hyptoheses *)
-  let has_been_proved c = H.mem proof (to_list c)
+  let has_been_proved c = H.mem !proof (to_list c)
 
   let is_proved (c, cl) =
-    if H.mem proof cl then
+    if H.mem !proof cl then
       true
     else if not St.(c.learnt) then begin
-      H.add proof cl Assumption;
+      H.add !proof cl Assumption;
       true
     end else match St.(c.cpremise) with
-      | St.Lemma p -> H.add proof cl (Lemma p); true
+      | St.Lemma p -> H.add !proof cl (Lemma p); true
       | St.History _ -> false
 
   let is_proven c = is_proved (c, to_list c)
@@ -121,7 +132,7 @@ module Make(L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S) = struct
     match resolved with
     | [] -> raise (Resolution_error "No literal to resolve over")
     | [a] ->
-      H.add proof new_clause (Resolution (a, (c, cl_c), (d, cl_d)));
+      H.add !proof new_clause (Resolution (a, (c, cl_c), (d, cl_d)));
       let new_c = St.make_clause (fresh_pcl_name ()) new_clause (List.length new_clause)
           true St.(History [c; d]) (max c.St.c_level d.St.c_level) in
       L.debug 5 "New clause : %a" St.pp_clause new_c;
@@ -219,28 +230,31 @@ module Make(L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S) = struct
       raise Insuficient_hyps
 
   (* Interface exposed *)
-  type proof_node = {
+  type proof = {
+    table : node H.t;
+    clause : clause * atom list;
+  }
+  and proof_node = {
     conclusion : clause;
     step : step;
   }
-  and proof = clause * atom list
   and step =
     | Hypothesis
     | Lemma of lemma
     | Resolution of proof * proof * atom
 
-  let expand (c, cl) =
-    let st = match H.find proof cl with
+  let expand { clause = (c, cl); table; } =
+    let st = match H.find table cl with
       | Assumption -> Hypothesis
       | Lemma l -> Lemma l
       | Resolution (a, cl_c, cl_d) ->
-        Resolution (cl_c, cl_d, a)
+        Resolution ({ clause = cl_c; table}, {clause = cl_d; table}, a)
     in
     { conclusion = c; step = st }
 
   let prove_unsat c =
     assert_can_prove_unsat c;
-    (St.empty_clause, [])
+    {clause = St.empty_clause, []; table = !proof; }
 
   (* Compute unsat-core *)
   let compare_cl c d =
@@ -270,15 +284,15 @@ module Make(L : Log_intf.S)(St : Solver_types.S) = struct
     | Enter of proof
     | Leaving of proof
 
-  let pop s = try Some (Stack.pop s) with Stack.Empty -> None
+  let spop s = try Some (Stack.pop s) with Stack.Empty -> None
 
   let rec fold_aux s h f acc =
-    match pop s with
+    match spop s with
     | None -> acc
-    | Some (Leaving ((_, cl) as p)) ->
+    | Some (Leaving ({clause = (_, cl)} as p)) ->
       H.add h cl true;
       fold_aux s h f (f acc (expand p))
-    | Some (Enter ((_, cl) as p)) ->
+    | Some (Enter ({clause = (_, cl)} as p)) ->
       if not (H.mem h cl) then begin
         Stack.push (Leaving p) s;
         let node = expand p in

solver/res.mli

@@ -8,5 +8,9 @@ module type S = Res_intf.S
 
 module Make :
   functor (L : Log_intf.S) ->
-  functor (St : Solver_types.S) -> S with module St = St
+  functor (St : Solver_types.S) -> sig
+    include S with module St = St
+    val push : unit -> int
+    val pop : int -> unit
+  end
 (** Functor to create a module building proofs from a sat-solver unsat trace. *)