mirror of
https://github.com/c-cube/sidekick.git
synced 2025-12-06 03:05:31 -05:00
fix doc test
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ac2267595
commit
84f7a39423
4 changed files with 25 additions and 15 deletions
18
doc/guide.md
18
doc/guide.md
|
|
@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ A list of theories can be added initially, or later using
|
|||
`Solver.add_theory`.
|
||||
|
||||
```ocaml
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[th_bool] ~proof:(Proof_stub.create()) tstore () ();;
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[th_bool] ~proof:(Proof.empty) tstore () ();;
|
||||
val solver : Solver.t = <abstr>
|
||||
|
||||
# Solver.add_theory;;
|
||||
|
|
@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ whether the assertions and hypotheses are satisfiable together.
|
|||
Solver.mk_lit_t solver q ~sign:false];;
|
||||
- : Solver.res =
|
||||
Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.Unsat
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>}
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>; unsat_proof_step = <fun>}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Here it's unsat, because we asserted "p = q", and then assumed "p"
|
||||
|
|
@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ val q_imp_not_r : Term.t = (=> q (not r))
|
|||
# Solver.solve ~assumptions:[] solver;;
|
||||
- : Solver.res =
|
||||
Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.Unsat
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>}
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>; unsat_proof_step = <fun>}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This time we got _unsat_ and there is no way of undoing it.
|
||||
|
|
@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ We can solve linear real arithmetic problems as well.
|
|||
Let's create a new solver and add the theory of reals to it.
|
||||
|
||||
```ocaml
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[th_bool; th_lra] ~proof:(Proof_stub.create()) tstore () ();;
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[th_bool; th_lra] ~proof:(Proof.empty) tstore () ();;
|
||||
val solver : Solver.t = <abstr>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ val b_leq_half : Term.t = (<= b 1/2)
|
|||
Solver.mk_lit_t solver b_leq_half];;
|
||||
val res : Solver.res =
|
||||
Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.Unsat
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>}
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>; unsat_proof_step = <fun>}
|
||||
|
||||
# match res with Solver.Unsat {unsat_core=us; _} -> us() |> Iter.to_list | _ -> assert false;;
|
||||
- : Proof_stub.lit list = [(a >= 1); (b <= 1/2)]
|
||||
- : Proof.lit list = [(a >= 1); (b <= 1/2)]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This just showed that `a=1, b=1/2, a>=b` is unsatisfiable.
|
||||
|
|
@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ val f1_u1 : Term.t = (f1 u1)
|
|||
Anyway, Sidekick knows how to reason about functions.
|
||||
|
||||
```ocaml
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[] ~proof:(Proof_stub.create()) tstore () ();;
|
||||
# let solver = Solver.create ~theories:[] ~proof:(Proof.empty) tstore () ();;
|
||||
val solver : Solver.t = <abstr>
|
||||
|
||||
# (* helper *)
|
||||
|
|
@ -422,13 +422,13 @@ val appf1 : Term.t list -> Term.t = <fun>
|
|||
~assumptions:[Solver.mk_lit_t solver ~sign:false (Term.eq tstore u1 (appf1[u1]))];;
|
||||
- : Solver.res =
|
||||
Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.Unsat
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>}
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>; unsat_proof_step = <fun>}
|
||||
|
||||
# Solver.solve solver
|
||||
~assumptions:[Solver.mk_lit_t solver ~sign:false (Term.eq tstore u2 u3)];;
|
||||
- : Solver.res =
|
||||
Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.Unsat
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>}
|
||||
{Sidekick_base_solver.Solver.unsat_core = <fun>; unsat_proof_step = <fun>}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming: `f1(u1)=u2, f1(u2)=u3, f1^2(u1)=u1, f1^3(u1)=u1`,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ let create ?(config=Config.default) () : t =
|
|||
steps_writer; storage; dispose;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let empty = create ~config:Config.empty ()
|
||||
|
||||
let iter_chunks_ (r:CS.Reader.t) k =
|
||||
let rec loop () =
|
||||
CS.Reader.next r
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ val create : ?config:Config.t -> unit -> t
|
|||
(** Create new proof.
|
||||
@param config modifies the proof behavior *)
|
||||
|
||||
val empty : t
|
||||
(** Empty proof, stores nothing *)
|
||||
|
||||
val disable : t -> unit
|
||||
(** Disable proof, even if the config would enable it *)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,10 +2,13 @@
|
|||
module CS = Chunk_stack
|
||||
module Proof_ser = Sidekick_base_proof_trace.Proof_ser
|
||||
|
||||
let parse_file (file:string) : unit =
|
||||
Log.debugf 2 (fun k->k"parsing file %S" file);
|
||||
let file = ref ""
|
||||
let quiet = ref false
|
||||
|
||||
CS.Reader.with_file_backward file @@ fun reader ->
|
||||
let parse_file () : unit =
|
||||
Log.debugf 2 (fun k->k"parsing file %S" !file);
|
||||
|
||||
CS.Reader.with_file_backward !file @@ fun reader ->
|
||||
|
||||
let n = ref 0 in
|
||||
let rec display_steps () =
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,7 +18,9 @@ let parse_file (file:string) : unit =
|
|||
let decode = {Proof_ser.Bare.Decode.bs=b; off=i} in
|
||||
let step = Proof_ser.Step.decode decode in
|
||||
incr n;
|
||||
if not !quiet then (
|
||||
Format.printf "@[<2>%a@]@." Proof_ser.Step.pp step;
|
||||
);
|
||||
display_steps();
|
||||
);
|
||||
in
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,12 +29,12 @@ let parse_file (file:string) : unit =
|
|||
()
|
||||
|
||||
let () =
|
||||
let file = ref "" in
|
||||
let opts = [
|
||||
"--bt", Arg.Unit (fun () -> Printexc.record_backtrace true), " enable stack traces";
|
||||
"-d", Arg.Int Log.set_debug, "<lvl> sets the debug verbose level";
|
||||
"-q", Arg.Set quiet, " quiet: do not print steps";
|
||||
] |> Arg.align in
|
||||
Arg.parse opts (fun f -> file := f) "proof-trace-dump <file>";
|
||||
if !file = "" then failwith "please provide a file";
|
||||
|
||||
parse_file !file
|
||||
parse_file ()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue