(** {1 Linear Rational Arithmetic} *)

(* Reference:
   http://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/logics-all.shtml#QF_LRA *)

open Sidekick_core

module Predicate = Sidekick_simplex.Predicate
module Linear_expr = Sidekick_simplex.Linear_expr
module Linear_expr_intf = Sidekick_simplex.Linear_expr_intf

module type INT = Sidekick_arith.INT
module type RATIONAL = Sidekick_arith.RATIONAL

module S_op = Sidekick_simplex.Op

type pred = Linear_expr_intf.bool_op = Leq | Geq | Lt | Gt | Eq | Neq
type op = Linear_expr_intf.op = Plus | Minus

type ('num, 'a) lra_view =
  | LRA_pred of pred * 'a * 'a
  | LRA_op of op * 'a * 'a
  | LRA_mult of 'num * 'a
  | LRA_const of 'num
  | LRA_other of 'a

let map_view f (l:_ lra_view) : _ lra_view =
  begin match l with
    | LRA_pred (p, a, b) -> LRA_pred (p, f a, f b)
    | LRA_op (p, a, b) -> LRA_op (p, f a, f b)
    | LRA_mult (n,a) -> LRA_mult (n, f a)
    | LRA_const q -> LRA_const q
    | LRA_other x -> LRA_other (f x)
  end

module type ARG = sig
  module S : Sidekick_core.SOLVER
  module Z : INT
  module Q : RATIONAL with type bigint = Z.t

  type term = S.T.Term.t
  type ty = S.T.Ty.t

  val view_as_lra : term -> (Q.t, term) lra_view
  (** Project the term into the theory view *)

  val mk_bool : S.T.Term.store -> bool -> term

  val mk_lra : S.T.Term.store -> (Q.t, term) lra_view -> term
  (** Make a term from the given theory view *)

  val ty_lra : S.T.Term.store -> ty

  val mk_eq : S.T.Term.store -> term -> term -> term
  (** syntactic equality *)

  val has_ty_real : term -> bool
  (** Does this term have the type [Real] *)

  val lemma_lra : S.Lit.t Iter.t -> S.P.proof_rule

  module Gensym : sig
    type t

    val create : S.T.Term.store -> t

    val tst : t -> S.T.Term.store

    val copy : t -> t

    val fresh_term : t -> pre:string -> S.T.Ty.t -> term
    (** Make a fresh term of the given type *)
  end
end

module type S = sig
  module A : ARG

  (*
  module SimpVar : Sidekick_simplex.VAR with type lit = A.S.Lit.t
  module LE_ : Linear_expr_intf.S with module Var = SimpVar
  module LE = LE_.Expr
     *)

  (** Simplexe *)
  module SimpSolver : Sidekick_simplex.S

  type state

  val create : ?stat:Stat.t ->
    A.S.Solver_internal.t ->
    state

  (* TODO: be able to declare some variables as ints *)

  (*
  val simplex : state -> Simplex.t
     *)

  val k_state : state A.S.Solver_internal.Registry.key
  (** Key to access the state from outside,
      available when the theory has been setup *)

  val theory : A.S.theory
end

module Make(A : ARG) : S with module A = A = struct
  module A = A
  module Ty = A.S.T.Ty
  module T = A.S.T.Term
  module Lit = A.S.Solver_internal.Lit
  module SI = A.S.Solver_internal
  module N = A.S.Solver_internal.CC.N

  module Tag = struct
    type t =
      | Lit of Lit.t
      | CC_eq of N.t * N.t

    let pp out = function
      | Lit l -> Fmt.fprintf out "(@[lit %a@])" Lit.pp l
      | CC_eq (n1,n2) -> Fmt.fprintf out "(@[cc-eq@ %a@ %a@])" N.pp n1 N.pp n2

    let to_lits si = function
      | Lit l -> [l]
      | CC_eq (n1,n2) ->
        let r = SI.CC.explain_eq (SI.cc si) n1 n2 in
        assert (not (SI.CC.Resolved_expl.is_semantic r));
        r.lits
  end

  module SimpVar
    : Linear_expr.VAR
      with type t = A.term
       and type lit = Tag.t
  = struct
    type t = A.term
    let pp = A.S.T.Term.pp
    let compare = A.S.T.Term.compare
    type lit = Tag.t
    let pp_lit = Tag.pp
    let not_lit = function
      | Tag.Lit l -> Some (Tag.Lit (Lit.neg l))
      | _ -> None
  end

  module LE_ = Linear_expr.Make(A.Q)(SimpVar)
  module LE = LE_.Expr
  module SimpSolver = Sidekick_simplex.Make(struct
      module Z = A.Z
      module Q = A.Q
      module Var = SimpVar
      let mk_lit _ _ _ = assert false
    end)
  module Subst = SimpSolver.Subst

  module Comb_map = CCMap.Make(LE_.Comb)

  (* turn the term into a linear expression. Apply [f] on leaves. *)
  let rec as_linexp (t:T.t) : LE.t =
    let open LE.Infix in
    match A.view_as_lra t with
    | LRA_other _ -> LE.monomial1 t
    | LRA_pred _ ->
      Error.errorf "type error: in linexp, LRA predicate %a" T.pp t
    | LRA_op (op, t1, t2) ->
      let t1 = as_linexp t1 in
      let t2 = as_linexp t2 in
      begin match op with
        | Plus -> t1 + t2
        | Minus -> t1 - t2
      end
    | LRA_mult (n, x) ->
      let t = as_linexp x in
      LE.( n * t )
    | LRA_const q -> LE.of_const q

  (* monoid to track linear expressions in congruence classes, to clash on merge *)
  module Monoid_exprs = struct
    module SI = SI
    let name = "lra.const"
    type single = {
      le: LE.t;
      n: N.t;
    }
    type t = single list

    let pp_single out {le=_;n} = N.pp out n

    let pp out self =
      match self with
      | [] -> ()
      | [x] -> pp_single out x
      | _ -> Fmt.fprintf out "(@[exprs@ %a@])" (Util.pp_list pp_single) self

    let of_term _cc n t = match A.view_as_lra t with
      | LRA_const _ | LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
        let le = as_linexp t in
        Some [{n; le}], []
      | LRA_other _ | LRA_pred _ ->
        None, []

    exception Confl of SI.CC.Expl.t

    (* merge lists. If two linear expressions equal up to a constant are
       merged, conflict. *)
    let merge _cc n1 l1 n2 l2 expl_12 : _ result =
      try
        let i = Iter.(product (of_list l1) (of_list l2)) in
        i (fun (s1,s2) ->
            let le = LE.(s1.le - s2.le) in
            if LE.is_const le && not (LE.is_zero le) then (
              (* conflict: [le+c = le + d] is impossible *)
              let expl =
                let open SI.CC.Expl in
                mk_list
                  [mk_merge s1.n n1; mk_merge s2.n n2; expl_12] in
              raise (Confl expl)
            ));
        Ok (List.rev_append l1 l2)
      with
      Confl expl -> Error expl
  end

  module ST_exprs = Sidekick_core.Monoid_of_repr(Monoid_exprs)

  type state = {
    tst: T.store;
    ty_st: Ty.store;
    proof: SI.P.t;
    gensym: A.Gensym.t;
    in_model: unit T.Tbl.t; (* terms to add to model *)
    encoded_eqs: unit T.Tbl.t; (* [a=b] gets clause [a = b <=> (a >= b /\ a <= b)] *)
    needs_th_combination: unit T.Tbl.t; (* terms that require theory combination *)
    simp_preds: (T.t * S_op.t * A.Q.t) T.Tbl.t; (* term -> its simplex meaning *)
    simp_defined: LE.t T.Tbl.t; (* (rational) terms that are equal to a linexp *)
    st_exprs : ST_exprs.t;
    mutable encoded_le: T.t Comb_map.t; (* [le] -> var encoding [le] *)
    simplex: SimpSolver.t;
    mutable last_res: SimpSolver.result option;
  }

  let create ?(stat=Stat.create()) (si:SI.t) : state =
    let proof = SI.proof si in
    let tst = SI.tst si in
    let ty_st = SI.ty_st si in
    { tst; ty_st;
      proof;
      in_model=T.Tbl.create 8;
      st_exprs=ST_exprs.create_and_setup si;
      gensym=A.Gensym.create tst;
      simp_preds=T.Tbl.create 32;
      simp_defined=T.Tbl.create 16;
      encoded_eqs=T.Tbl.create 8;
      needs_th_combination=T.Tbl.create 8;
      encoded_le=Comb_map.empty;
      simplex=SimpSolver.create ~stat ();
      last_res=None;
    }

  let[@inline] reset_res_ (self:state) : unit =
    self.last_res <- None

  let[@inline] n_levels self : int = ST_exprs.n_levels self.st_exprs
  let push_level self =
    ST_exprs.push_level self.st_exprs;
    SimpSolver.push_level self.simplex;
    ()

  let pop_levels self n =
    reset_res_ self;
    ST_exprs.pop_levels self.st_exprs n;
    SimpSolver.pop_levels self.simplex n;
    ()

  let fresh_term self ~pre ty = A.Gensym.fresh_term self.gensym ~pre ty
  let fresh_lit (self:state) ~mk_lit ~pre : Lit.t =
    let t = fresh_term ~pre self (Ty.bool self.ty_st) in
    mk_lit t

  let pp_pred_def out (p,l1,l2) : unit =
    Fmt.fprintf out "(@[%a@ :l1 %a@ :l2 %a@])" Predicate.pp p LE.pp l1 LE.pp l2

  let[@inline] t_const self n : T.t = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const n)
  let[@inline] t_zero self : T.t = t_const self A.Q.zero

  let[@inline] is_const_ t = match A.view_as_lra t with LRA_const _ -> true | _ -> false
  let[@inline] as_const_ t = match A.view_as_lra t with LRA_const n -> Some n | _ -> None
  let[@inline] is_zero t = match A.view_as_lra t with LRA_const n -> A.Q.(n = zero) | _ -> false

  let t_of_comb (self:state) (comb:LE_.Comb.t) ~(init:T.t) : T.t =
    let[@inline] (+) a b = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_op (Plus, a, b)) in
    let[@inline] ( * ) a b = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_mult (a, b)) in

    let cur = ref init in
    LE_.Comb.iter
      (fun t c ->
         let tc = if A.Q.(c = of_int 1) then t else c * t in
         cur := if is_zero !cur then tc else !cur + tc
      )
      comb;
    !cur

  (* encode back into a term *)
  let t_of_linexp (self:state) (le:LE.t) : T.t =
    let comb = LE.comb le in
    let const = LE.const le in
    t_of_comb self comb ~init:(A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const const))

  (* return a variable that is equal to [le_comb] in the simplex. *)
  let var_encoding_comb ~pre self (le_comb:LE_.Comb.t) : T.t =
    assert (not (LE_.Comb.is_empty le_comb));
    match LE_.Comb.as_singleton le_comb with
    | Some (c, x) when A.Q.(c = one) -> x (* trivial linexp *)
    | _ ->
      match Comb_map.find le_comb self.encoded_le with
      | x -> x (* already encoded that *)
      | exception Not_found ->
        (* new variable to represent [le_comb] *)
        let proxy = fresh_term self ~pre (A.ty_lra self.tst) in
        (* TODO: define proxy *)
        self.encoded_le <- Comb_map.add le_comb proxy self.encoded_le;
        Log.debugf 50
          (fun k->k "(@[lra.encode-linexp@ `@[%a@]`@ :into-var %a@])" LE_.Comb.pp le_comb T.pp proxy);

        LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v) le_comb;
        SimpSolver.define self.simplex proxy (LE_.Comb.to_list le_comb);
        proxy

  let add_clause_lra_ ?using (module PA:SI.PREPROCESS_ACTS) lits =
    let pr = A.lemma_lra (Iter.of_list lits) PA.proof in
    let pr = match using with
      | None -> pr
      | Some using -> SI.P.lemma_rw_clause pr ~res:(Iter.of_list lits) ~using PA.proof in
    PA.add_clause lits pr

  let s_op_of_pred pred : S_op.t =
    match pred with
    | Eq | Neq -> assert false (* unreachable *)
    | Leq -> S_op.Leq
    | Lt -> S_op.Lt
    | Geq -> S_op.Geq
    | Gt -> S_op.Gt

  (* TODO: refactor that and {!var_encoding_comb} *)
  (* turn a linear expression into a single constant and a coeff.
     This might define a side variable in the simplex. *)
  let le_comb_to_singleton_ (self:state) (le_comb:LE_.Comb.t) : T.t * A.Q.t =
    begin match LE_.Comb.as_singleton le_comb with
      | Some (coeff, v) -> v, coeff

      | None ->
        (* non trivial linexp, give it a fresh name in the simplex *)
        match Comb_map.get le_comb self.encoded_le with
        | Some x -> x, A.Q.one (* already encoded that *)
        | None ->

          let proxy = fresh_term self ~pre:"_le_comb" (A.ty_lra self.tst) in

          self.encoded_le <- Comb_map.add le_comb proxy self.encoded_le;
          LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v) le_comb;
          SimpSolver.define self.simplex proxy (LE_.Comb.to_list le_comb);

          Log.debugf 50
            (fun k->k "(@[lra.encode-linexp.to-term@ `@[%a@]`@ :new-t %a@])"
                LE_.Comb.pp le_comb T.pp proxy);

          proxy, A.Q.one
    end

  (* look for subterms of type Real, for they will need theory combination *)
  let on_subterm (self:state) _ (t:T.t) : unit =
    Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.cc-on-subterm@ %a@])" T.pp t);
    match A.view_as_lra t with
    | LRA_other _ when not (A.has_ty_real t) -> ()
    | LRA_pred _ | LRA_const _ -> ()
    | LRA_op _ | LRA_other _ | LRA_mult _ ->
      if not (T.Tbl.mem self.needs_th_combination t) then (
        Log.debugf 5 (fun k->k "(@[lra.needs-th-combination@ %a@])" T.pp t);
        T.Tbl.add self.needs_th_combination t ();
      )

  (* preprocess linear expressions away *)
  let preproc_lra (self:state) si
      (module PA:SI.PREPROCESS_ACTS) (t:T.t) : unit =
    Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.preprocess@ %a@])" T.pp t);
    let tst = SI.tst si in

    (* tell the CC this term exists *)
    let declare_term_to_cc ~sub t =
      Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.declare-term-to-cc@ %a@])" T.pp t);
      ignore (SI.CC.add_term (SI.cc si) t : SI.CC.N.t);
      if sub then on_subterm self () t;
    in

    match A.view_as_lra t with
    | _ when T.Tbl.mem self.simp_preds t ->
      () (* already turned into a simplex predicate *)

    | LRA_pred ((Eq | Neq) as pred, t1, t2) when is_const_ t1 && is_const_ t2 ->
      (* comparison of constants: can decide right now *)
      begin match A.view_as_lra t1, A.view_as_lra t2 with
        | LRA_const n1, LRA_const n2 ->
          let is_eq = pred = Eq in
          let t_is_true = is_eq = (A.Q.equal n1 n2) in
          let lit = PA.mk_lit ~sign:t_is_true t in
          add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [lit]
        | _ -> assert false
      end

    | LRA_pred ((Eq | Neq), t1, t2) ->
      (* equality: just punt to [t1 = t2 <=> (t1 <= t2 /\ t1 >= t2)] *)
      let t, _ = T.abs tst t in
      if not (T.Tbl.mem self.encoded_eqs t) then (
        let u1 = A.mk_lra tst (LRA_pred (Leq, t1, t2)) in
        let u2 = A.mk_lra tst (LRA_pred (Geq, t1, t2)) in

        T.Tbl.add self.encoded_eqs t ();

        (* encode [t <=> (u1 /\ u2)] *)
        let lit_t = PA.mk_lit t in
        let lit_u1 = PA.mk_lit u1 in
        let lit_u2 = PA.mk_lit u2 in
        add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [SI.Lit.neg lit_t; lit_u1];
        add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [SI.Lit.neg lit_t; lit_u2];
        add_clause_lra_ (module PA)
          [SI.Lit.neg lit_u1; SI.Lit.neg lit_u2; lit_t];
      );

    | LRA_pred (pred, t1, t2) ->
      let l1 = as_linexp t1 in
      let l2 = as_linexp t2 in
      let le = LE.(l1 - l2) in
      let le_comb, le_const = LE.comb le, LE.const le in
      let le_const = A.Q.neg le_const in
      let op = s_op_of_pred pred in
      (* now we have [le_comb op le_const] *)

      (* obtain a single variable for the linear combination *)
      let v, c_v = le_comb_to_singleton_ self le_comb in
      declare_term_to_cc ~sub:false v;
      LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> declare_term_to_cc ~sub:true v) le_comb;

      (* turn into simplex constraint. For example,
         [c . v <= const] becomes a direct simplex constraint [v <= const/c]
         (beware the sign) *)

      (* make sure to swap sides if multiplying with a negative coeff *)
      let q = A.Q.( le_const / c_v ) in
      let op = if A.Q.(c_v < zero) then S_op.neg_sign op else op in

      let lit = PA.mk_lit t in
      let constr = SimpSolver.Constraint.mk v op q in
      SimpSolver.declare_bound self.simplex constr (Tag.Lit lit);
      T.Tbl.add self.simp_preds t (v, op, q);

      Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.preproc@ :t %a@ :to-constr %a@])"
                        T.pp t SimpSolver.Constraint.pp constr);

    | LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
      if not (T.Tbl.mem self.simp_defined t) then (
        (* we define these terms so their value in the model make sense *)
        let le = as_linexp t in
        T.Tbl.add self.simp_defined t le;
      );

    | LRA_const _n -> ()

    | LRA_other t when A.has_ty_real t -> ()
    | LRA_other _ ->
      ()

  let simplify (self:state) (_recurse:_) (t:T.t) : (T.t * SI.proof_step Iter.t) option =
    let proof_eq t u =
      A.lemma_lra
        (Iter.return (SI.Lit.atom self.tst (A.mk_eq self.tst t u))) self.proof
    in
    let proof_bool t ~sign:b =
      let lit = SI.Lit.atom ~sign:b self.tst t in
      A.lemma_lra (Iter.return lit) self.proof
    in

    match A.view_as_lra t with
    | LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
      let le = as_linexp t in
      if LE.is_const le then (
        let c = LE.const le in
        let u = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const c) in
        let pr = proof_eq t u in
        Some (u, Iter.return pr)
      ) else (
        let u = t_of_linexp self le in
        if t != u then (
          let pr = proof_eq t u in
          Some (u, Iter.return pr)
        ) else None
      )

    | LRA_pred ((Eq | Neq), _, _) ->
      (* never change equalities, it can affect theory combination *)
      None

    | LRA_pred (pred, l1, l2) ->
      let le = LE.(as_linexp l1 - as_linexp l2) in

      if LE.is_const le then (
        let c = LE.const le in
        let is_true = match pred with
          | Leq -> A.Q.(c <= zero)
          | Geq -> A.Q.(c >= zero)
          | Lt -> A.Q.(c < zero)
          | Gt -> A.Q.(c > zero)
          | Eq -> A.Q.(c = zero)
          | Neq -> A.Q.(c <> zero)
        in
        let u = A.mk_bool self.tst is_true in
        let pr = proof_bool t ~sign:is_true in
        Some (u, Iter.return pr)

      ) else (
        (* le <= const *)
        let u = A.mk_lra self.tst
            (LRA_pred (pred, t_of_comb self (LE.comb le) ~init:(t_zero self),
                       t_const self (A.Q.neg @@ LE.const le))) in

        if t != u then (
          let pr = proof_eq t u in
          Some (u, Iter.return pr)
        ) else None
      )
    | _ -> None

  (* raise conflict from certificate *)
  let fail_with_cert si acts cert : 'a =
    Profile.with1 "lra.simplex.check-cert" SimpSolver._check_cert cert;
    let confl =
      SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.lits cert
      |> CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si)
      |>  List.rev_map SI.Lit.neg
    in
    let pr = A.lemma_lra (Iter.of_list confl) (SI.proof si) in
    SI.raise_conflict si acts confl pr

  let on_propagate_ si acts lit ~reason =
    match lit with
    | Tag.Lit lit ->
      (* TODO: more detailed proof certificate *)
      SI.propagate si acts lit
        ~reason:(fun() ->
           let lits = CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si) reason in
           let pr = A.lemma_lra Iter.(cons lit (of_list lits)) (SI.proof si) in
           CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si) reason, pr)
    | _ -> ()

  (** Check satisfiability of simplex, and sets [self.last_res] *)
  let check_simplex_ self si acts : SimpSolver.Subst.t =
    Log.debugf 5
      (fun k->k "(@[lra.check-simplex@ :n-vars %d :n-rows %d@])"
          (SimpSolver.n_vars self.simplex) (SimpSolver.n_rows self.simplex));
    let res =
      Profile.with_ "lra.simplex.solve" @@ fun () ->
      SimpSolver.check self.simplex
        ~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ si acts)
    in
    Log.debug 5 "(lra.check-simplex.done)";
    self.last_res <- Some res;
    begin match res with
      | SimpSolver.Sat m -> m
      | SimpSolver.Unsat cert ->
        Log.debugf 10
          (fun k->k "(@[lra.check.unsat@ :cert %a@])"
              SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.pp cert);
        fail_with_cert si acts cert
    end

  (* TODO: trivial propagations *)

  let add_local_eq_t (self:state) si acts t1 t2 ~tag : unit =
    Log.debugf 20 (fun k->k "(@[lra.add-local-eq@ %a@ %a@])" T.pp t1 T.pp t2);
    reset_res_ self;
    let t1, t2 = if T.compare t1 t2 > 0 then t2, t1 else t1, t2 in

    let le = LE.(as_linexp t1 - as_linexp t2) in
    let le_comb, le_const = LE.comb le, LE.const le in
    let le_const = A.Q.neg le_const in

    if LE_.Comb.is_empty le_comb then (
      if A.Q.(le_const <> zero) then (
        (* [c=0] when [c] is not 0 *)
        let lit = SI.Lit.neg @@ SI.mk_lit si acts @@ A.mk_eq self.tst t1 t2 in
        let pr = A.lemma_lra (Iter.return lit) self.proof in
        SI.add_clause_permanent si acts [lit] pr
      )
    ) else (

      let v = var_encoding_comb ~pre:"le_local_eq" self le_comb in
      begin
        try
          let c1 = SimpSolver.Constraint.geq v le_const in
          SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex c1 tag
            ~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ si acts);
          let c2 = SimpSolver.Constraint.leq v le_const in
          SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex c2 tag
            ~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ si acts);
        with SimpSolver.E_unsat cert ->
          fail_with_cert si acts cert
      end;
    )

  let add_local_eq (self:state) si acts n1 n2 : unit =
    let t1 = N.term n1 in
    let t2 = N.term n2 in
    add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.CC_eq (n1, n2))

  (* evaluate a term directly, as a variable *)
  let eval_in_subst_ subst t = match A.view_as_lra t with
    | LRA_const n -> n
    | _ -> Subst.eval subst t |> Option.value ~default:A.Q.zero

  (* evaluate a linear expression *)
  let eval_le_in_subst_ subst (le:LE.t) =
    LE.eval (eval_in_subst_ subst) le

  (* FIXME: rename, this is more "provide_model_to_cc" *)
  let do_th_combination (self:state) _si _acts : _ Iter.t =
    Log.debug 1 "(lra.do-th-combinations)";
    let model = match self.last_res with
      | Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) -> m
      | _ -> assert false
    in

    let vals =
      Subst.to_iter model |> T.Tbl.of_iter
    in

    (* also include terms that occur under function symbols, if they're
       not in the model already *)
    T.Tbl.iter
      (fun t () ->
         if not (T.Tbl.mem vals t) then (
           let v = eval_in_subst_ model t in
           T.Tbl.add vals t v;
         ))
      self.needs_th_combination;

    (* also consider subterms that are linear expressions,
       and evaluate them using the value of each variable
       in that linear expression. For example a term [a + 2b]
       is evaluated as [eval(a) + 2 × eval(b)]. *)
    T.Tbl.iter
      (fun t le ->
         if not (T.Tbl.mem vals t) then (
           let v = eval_le_in_subst_ model le in
           T.Tbl.add vals t v
         ))
      self.simp_defined;

    (* return whole model *)
    begin
      T.Tbl.to_iter vals
      |> Iter.map (fun (t,v) -> t, t_const self v)
    end

  (* partial checks is where we add literals from the trail to the
     simplex. *)
  let partial_check_ self si acts trail : unit =
    Profile.with_ "lra.partial-check" @@ fun () ->

    reset_res_ self;
    let changed = ref false in

    let examine_lit lit =
      let sign = SI.Lit.sign lit in
      let lit_t = SI.Lit.term lit in
      match T.Tbl.get self.simp_preds lit_t, A.view_as_lra lit_t with
      | Some (v,op,q), _ ->

        Log.debugf 50
          (fun k->k "(@[lra.partial-check.add@ :lit %a@ :lit-t %a@])"
                          SI.Lit.pp lit T.pp lit_t);

        (* need to account for the literal's sign *)
        let op = if sign then op else S_op.not_ op in

        (* assert new constraint to Simplex *)
        let constr = SimpSolver.Constraint.mk v op q in
        Log.debugf 10
          (fun k->k "(@[lra.partial-check.assert@ %a@])"
              SimpSolver.Constraint.pp constr);
        begin
          changed := true;
          try
            SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v;
            SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex constr (Tag.Lit lit)
              ~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ si acts);
          with SimpSolver.E_unsat cert ->
            Log.debugf 10
              (fun k->k "(@[lra.partial-check.unsat@ :cert %a@])"
                  SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.pp cert);
            fail_with_cert si acts cert
        end

      | None, LRA_pred (Eq, t1, t2) when sign ->
        add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.Lit lit);

      | None, LRA_pred (Neq, t1, t2) when not sign ->
        add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.Lit lit);

      | None, _ -> ()
    in

    Iter.iter examine_lit trail;

    (* incremental check *)
    if !changed then (
      ignore (check_simplex_ self si acts : SimpSolver.Subst.t);
    );
    ()

  let final_check_ (self:state) si (acts:SI.theory_actions) (_trail:_ Iter.t) : unit =
    Log.debug 5 "(th-lra.final-check)";
    Profile.with_ "lra.final-check" @@ fun () ->
    reset_res_ self;

    (* add equalities between linear-expressions merged in the congruence closure *)
    ST_exprs.iter_all self.st_exprs
      (fun (_,l) ->
         Iter.diagonal_l l
           (fun (s1, s2) ->
              add_local_eq self si acts s1.n s2.n));

    (* TODO: jiggle model to reduce the number of variables that
       have the same value *)
    let model = check_simplex_ self si acts in
    Log.debugf 20 (fun k->k "(@[lra.model@ %a@])" SimpSolver.Subst.pp model);
    Log.debug 5 "(lra: solver returns SAT)";
    ()

  (* help generating model *)
  let model_ask_ (self:state) ~recurse:_ _si n : _ option =
    let t = N.term n in
    begin match self.last_res with
      | Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) ->
        Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.model-ask@ %a@])" T.pp t);
        begin match A.view_as_lra t with
          | LRA_const n -> Some n (* always eval constants to themselves *)
          | _ -> SimpSolver.V_map.get t m
        end |> Option.map (t_const self)
      | _ -> None
    end

  (* help generating model *)
  let model_complete_ (self:state) _si ~add : unit =
    Log.debugf 30 (fun k->k "(lra.model-complete)");
    begin match self.last_res with
      | Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) when T.Tbl.length self.in_model > 0 ->
        Log.debugf 50 (fun k->k "(@[lra.in_model@ %a@])"
                          (Util.pp_iter T.pp) (T.Tbl.keys self.in_model));

        let add_t t () =
          match SimpSolver.V_map.get t m with
          | None -> ()
          | Some u -> add t (t_const self u)
        in
        T.Tbl.iter add_t self.in_model

      | _ -> ()
    end

  let k_state = SI.Registry.create_key ()

  let create_and_setup si =
    Log.debug 2 "(th-lra.setup)";
    let stat = SI.stats si in
    let st = create ~stat si in
    SI.Registry.set (SI.registry si) k_state st;
    SI.add_simplifier si (simplify st);
    SI.on_preprocess si (preproc_lra st);
    SI.on_final_check si (final_check_ st);
    SI.on_partial_check si (partial_check_ st);
    SI.on_model si ~ask:(model_ask_ st) ~complete:(model_complete_ st);
    SI.on_cc_is_subterm si (on_subterm st);
    SI.on_cc_pre_merge si
      (fun si acts n1 n2 expl ->
         match as_const_ (N.term n1), as_const_ (N.term n2) with
         | Some q1, Some q2 when A.Q.(q1 <> q2) ->
           (* classes with incompatible constants *)
           Log.debugf 30 (fun k->k "(@[lra.merge-incompatible-consts@ %a@ %a@])" N.pp n1 N.pp n2);
           SI.CC.raise_conflict_from_expl si acts expl
         | _ -> ());
    SI.on_th_combination si (do_th_combination st);
    st

  let theory =
    A.S.mk_theory
      ~name:"th-lra"
      ~create_and_setup ~push_level ~pop_levels
      ()
end