mirror of
https://github.com/c-cube/sidekick.git
synced 2025-12-06 03:05:31 -05:00
733 lines
24 KiB
OCaml
733 lines
24 KiB
OCaml
(* Reference:
|
||
http://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/logics-all.shtml#QF_LRA *)
|
||
|
||
open Sidekick_core
|
||
open Sidekick_cc
|
||
module Intf = Intf
|
||
include Intf
|
||
module SI = SMT.Solver_internal
|
||
|
||
module Tag = struct
|
||
type t = Lit of Lit.t | CC_eq of E_node.t * E_node.t
|
||
|
||
let pp out = function
|
||
| Lit l -> Fmt.fprintf out "(@[lit %a@])" Lit.pp l
|
||
| CC_eq (n1, n2) ->
|
||
Fmt.fprintf out "(@[cc-eq@ %a@ %a@])" E_node.pp n1 E_node.pp n2
|
||
|
||
let to_lits si = function
|
||
| Lit l -> [ l ]
|
||
| CC_eq (n1, n2) ->
|
||
let r = CC.explain_eq (SI.cc si) n1 n2 in
|
||
(* FIXME
|
||
assert (not (SI.CC.Resolved_expl.is_semantic r));
|
||
*)
|
||
r.lits
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
module SimpVar : Linear_expr.VAR with type t = Term.t and type lit = Tag.t =
|
||
struct
|
||
type t = Term.t
|
||
|
||
let pp = Term.pp_debug
|
||
let compare = Term.compare
|
||
|
||
type lit = Tag.t
|
||
|
||
let pp_lit = Tag.pp
|
||
|
||
let not_lit = function
|
||
| Tag.Lit l -> Some (Tag.Lit (Lit.neg l))
|
||
| _ -> None
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
module Make (A : ARG) = (* : S with module A = A *) struct
|
||
module LE_ = Linear_expr.Make (A.Q) (SimpVar)
|
||
module LE = LE_.Expr
|
||
|
||
module SimpSolver = Sidekick_simplex.Make (struct
|
||
module Z = A.Z
|
||
module Q = A.Q
|
||
module Var = SimpVar
|
||
|
||
let mk_lit _ _ _ = assert false
|
||
end)
|
||
|
||
module Subst = SimpSolver.Subst
|
||
module Comb_map = CCMap.Make (LE_.Comb)
|
||
|
||
(* turn the term into a linear expression. Apply [f] on leaves. *)
|
||
let rec as_linexp (t : Term.t) : LE.t =
|
||
let open LE.Infix in
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_other _ -> LE.monomial1 t
|
||
| LRA_pred _ ->
|
||
Error.errorf "type error: in linexp, LRA predicate %a" Term.pp_debug t
|
||
| LRA_op (op, t1, t2) ->
|
||
let t1 = as_linexp t1 in
|
||
let t2 = as_linexp t2 in
|
||
(match op with
|
||
| Plus -> t1 + t2
|
||
| Minus -> t1 - t2)
|
||
| LRA_mult (n, x) ->
|
||
let t = as_linexp x in
|
||
LE.(n * t)
|
||
| LRA_const q -> LE.of_const q
|
||
|
||
(* monoid to track linear expressions in congruence classes, to clash on merge *)
|
||
module Monoid_exprs = struct
|
||
let name = "lra.const"
|
||
|
||
type state = unit
|
||
|
||
let create _ = ()
|
||
|
||
type single = { le: LE.t; n: E_node.t }
|
||
type t = single list
|
||
|
||
let pp_single out { le = _; n } = E_node.pp out n
|
||
|
||
let pp out self =
|
||
match self with
|
||
| [] -> ()
|
||
| [ x ] -> pp_single out x
|
||
| _ -> Fmt.fprintf out "(@[exprs@ %a@])" (Util.pp_list pp_single) self
|
||
|
||
let of_term _cc () n t =
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const _ | LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
|
||
let le = as_linexp t in
|
||
Some [ { n; le } ], []
|
||
| LRA_other _ | LRA_pred _ -> None, []
|
||
|
||
exception Confl of Expl.t
|
||
|
||
(* merge lists. If two linear expressions equal up to a constant are
|
||
merged, conflict. *)
|
||
let merge _cc () n1 l1 n2 l2 expl_12 : _ result =
|
||
try
|
||
let i = Iter.(product (of_list l1) (of_list l2)) in
|
||
i (fun (s1, s2) ->
|
||
let le = LE.(s1.le - s2.le) in
|
||
if LE.is_const le && not (LE.is_zero le) then (
|
||
(* conflict: [le+c = le + d] is impossible *)
|
||
let expl =
|
||
let open Expl in
|
||
mk_list [ mk_merge s1.n n1; mk_merge s2.n n2; expl_12 ]
|
||
in
|
||
raise (Confl expl)
|
||
));
|
||
Ok (List.rev_append l1 l2, [])
|
||
with Confl expl -> Error (CC.Handler_action.Conflict expl)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
module ST_exprs = Sidekick_cc.Plugin.Make (Monoid_exprs)
|
||
|
||
type state = {
|
||
th_id: Sidekick_smt_solver.Theory_id.t;
|
||
tst: Term.store;
|
||
proof: Proof_trace.t;
|
||
gensym: Gensym.t;
|
||
in_model: unit Term.Tbl.t; (* terms to add to model *)
|
||
encoded_eqs: unit Term.Tbl.t;
|
||
(* [a=b] gets clause [a = b <=> (a >= b /\ a <= b)] *)
|
||
simp_preds: (Term.t * S_op.t * A.Q.t) Term.Tbl.t;
|
||
(* term -> its simplex meaning *)
|
||
simp_defined: LE.t Term.Tbl.t;
|
||
(* (rational) terms that are equal to a linexp *)
|
||
st_exprs: ST_exprs.t;
|
||
mutable encoded_le: Term.t Comb_map.t; (* [le] -> var encoding [le] *)
|
||
simplex: SimpSolver.t;
|
||
mutable last_res: SimpSolver.result option;
|
||
n_propagate: int Stat.counter;
|
||
n_conflict: int Stat.counter;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let create ~th_id (si : SI.t) : state =
|
||
let stat = SI.stats si in
|
||
let proof = SI.proof si in
|
||
let tst = SI.tst si in
|
||
{
|
||
th_id;
|
||
tst;
|
||
proof;
|
||
in_model = Term.Tbl.create 8;
|
||
st_exprs = ST_exprs.create_and_setup (SI.cc si);
|
||
gensym = Gensym.create tst;
|
||
simp_preds = Term.Tbl.create 32;
|
||
simp_defined = Term.Tbl.create 16;
|
||
encoded_eqs = Term.Tbl.create 8;
|
||
encoded_le = Comb_map.empty;
|
||
simplex = SimpSolver.create ~stat ();
|
||
last_res = None;
|
||
n_propagate = Stat.mk_int stat "th.lra.propagate";
|
||
n_conflict = Stat.mk_int stat "th.lra.conflicts";
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let[@inline] reset_res_ (self : state) : unit = self.last_res <- None
|
||
let[@inline] n_levels self : int = ST_exprs.n_levels self.st_exprs
|
||
|
||
let push_level self =
|
||
ST_exprs.push_level self.st_exprs;
|
||
SimpSolver.push_level self.simplex;
|
||
()
|
||
|
||
let pop_levels self n =
|
||
reset_res_ self;
|
||
ST_exprs.pop_levels self.st_exprs n;
|
||
SimpSolver.pop_levels self.simplex n;
|
||
()
|
||
|
||
let fresh_term self ~pre ty = Gensym.fresh_term self.gensym ~pre ty
|
||
|
||
let fresh_lit (self : state) ~mk_lit ~pre : Lit.t =
|
||
let t = fresh_term ~pre self (Term.bool self.tst) in
|
||
mk_lit t
|
||
|
||
let pp_pred_def out (p, l1, l2) : unit =
|
||
Fmt.fprintf out "(@[%a@ :l1 %a@ :l2 %a@])" Predicate.pp p LE.pp l1 LE.pp l2
|
||
|
||
let[@inline] t_const self n : Term.t = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const n)
|
||
let[@inline] t_zero self : Term.t = t_const self A.Q.zero
|
||
|
||
let[@inline] is_const_ t =
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const _ -> true
|
||
| _ -> false
|
||
|
||
let[@inline] as_const_ t =
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const n -> Some n
|
||
| _ -> None
|
||
|
||
let[@inline] is_zero t =
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const n -> A.Q.(n = zero)
|
||
| _ -> false
|
||
|
||
let t_of_comb (self : state) (comb : LE_.Comb.t) ~(init : Term.t) : Term.t =
|
||
let[@inline] ( + ) a b = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_op (Plus, a, b)) in
|
||
let[@inline] ( * ) a b = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_mult (a, b)) in
|
||
|
||
let cur = ref init in
|
||
LE_.Comb.iter
|
||
(fun t c ->
|
||
let tc =
|
||
if A.Q.(c = of_int 1) then
|
||
t
|
||
else
|
||
c * t
|
||
in
|
||
cur :=
|
||
if is_zero !cur then
|
||
tc
|
||
else
|
||
!cur + tc)
|
||
comb;
|
||
!cur
|
||
|
||
(* encode back into a term *)
|
||
let t_of_linexp (self : state) (le : LE.t) : Term.t =
|
||
let comb = LE.comb le in
|
||
let const = LE.const le in
|
||
t_of_comb self comb ~init:(A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const const))
|
||
|
||
(* return a variable that is equal to [le_comb] in the simplex. *)
|
||
let var_encoding_comb ~pre self (le_comb : LE_.Comb.t) : Term.t =
|
||
assert (not (LE_.Comb.is_empty le_comb));
|
||
match LE_.Comb.as_singleton le_comb with
|
||
| Some (c, x) when A.Q.(c = one) -> x (* trivial linexp *)
|
||
| _ ->
|
||
(match Comb_map.find le_comb self.encoded_le with
|
||
| x -> x (* already encoded that *)
|
||
| exception Not_found ->
|
||
(* new variable to represent [le_comb] *)
|
||
let proxy = fresh_term self ~pre (A.ty_real self.tst) in
|
||
(* TODO: define proxy *)
|
||
self.encoded_le <- Comb_map.add le_comb proxy self.encoded_le;
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.encode-linexp@ `@[%a@]`@ :into-var %a@])" LE_.Comb.pp
|
||
le_comb Term.pp_debug proxy);
|
||
|
||
LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v) le_comb;
|
||
SimpSolver.define self.simplex proxy (LE_.Comb.to_list le_comb);
|
||
proxy)
|
||
|
||
let add_clause_lra_ ?using (module PA : SI.PREPROCESS_ACTS) lits =
|
||
let pr =
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step PA.proof @@ fun () -> Proof_rules.lemma_lra lits
|
||
in
|
||
let pr =
|
||
match using with
|
||
| None -> pr
|
||
| Some using ->
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step PA.proof @@ fun () ->
|
||
Proof_core.lemma_rw_clause pr ~res:lits ~using
|
||
in
|
||
PA.add_clause lits pr
|
||
|
||
let s_op_of_pred pred : S_op.t =
|
||
match pred with
|
||
| Eq | Neq -> assert false (* unreachable *)
|
||
| Leq -> S_op.Leq
|
||
| Lt -> S_op.Lt
|
||
| Geq -> S_op.Geq
|
||
| Gt -> S_op.Gt
|
||
|
||
(* TODO: refactor that and {!var_encoding_comb} *)
|
||
(* turn a linear expression into a single constant and a coeff.
|
||
This might define a side variable in the simplex. *)
|
||
let le_comb_to_singleton_ (self : state) (le_comb : LE_.Comb.t) :
|
||
Term.t * A.Q.t =
|
||
match LE_.Comb.as_singleton le_comb with
|
||
| Some (coeff, v) -> v, coeff
|
||
| None ->
|
||
(* non trivial linexp, give it a fresh name in the simplex *)
|
||
(match Comb_map.get le_comb self.encoded_le with
|
||
| Some x -> x, A.Q.one (* already encoded that *)
|
||
| None ->
|
||
let proxy = fresh_term self ~pre:"_le_comb" (A.ty_real self.tst) in
|
||
|
||
self.encoded_le <- Comb_map.add le_comb proxy self.encoded_le;
|
||
LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v) le_comb;
|
||
SimpSolver.define self.simplex proxy (LE_.Comb.to_list le_comb);
|
||
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.encode-linexp.to-term@ `@[%a@]`@ :new-t %a@])" LE_.Comb.pp
|
||
le_comb Term.pp_debug proxy);
|
||
|
||
proxy, A.Q.one)
|
||
|
||
(* preprocess linear expressions away *)
|
||
let preproc_lra (self : state) si (module PA : SI.PREPROCESS_ACTS)
|
||
(t : Term.t) : unit =
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k -> k "(@[lra.preprocess@ %a@])" Term.pp_debug t);
|
||
let tst = SI.tst si in
|
||
|
||
(* tell the CC this term exists *)
|
||
let declare_term_to_cc ~sub:_ t =
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.declare-term-to-cc@ %a@])" Term.pp_debug t);
|
||
ignore (CC.add_term (SI.cc si) t : E_node.t)
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| _ when Term.Tbl.mem self.simp_preds t ->
|
||
() (* already turned into a simplex predicate *)
|
||
| LRA_pred (((Eq | Neq) as pred), t1, t2) when is_const_ t1 && is_const_ t2
|
||
->
|
||
(* comparison of constants: can decide right now *)
|
||
(match A.view_as_lra t1, A.view_as_lra t2 with
|
||
| LRA_const n1, LRA_const n2 ->
|
||
let is_eq = pred = Eq in
|
||
let t_is_true = is_eq = A.Q.equal n1 n2 in
|
||
let lit = PA.mk_lit ~sign:t_is_true t in
|
||
add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [ lit ]
|
||
| _ -> assert false)
|
||
| LRA_pred ((Eq | Neq), t1, t2) ->
|
||
(* equality: just punt to [t1 = t2 <=> (t1 <= t2 /\ t1 >= t2)] *)
|
||
let _, t = Term.abs self.tst t in
|
||
if not (Term.Tbl.mem self.encoded_eqs t) then (
|
||
let u1 = A.mk_lra tst (LRA_pred (Leq, t1, t2)) in
|
||
let u2 = A.mk_lra tst (LRA_pred (Geq, t1, t2)) in
|
||
|
||
Term.Tbl.add self.encoded_eqs t ();
|
||
|
||
(* encode [t <=> (u1 /\ u2)] *)
|
||
let lit_t = PA.mk_lit t in
|
||
let lit_u1 = PA.mk_lit u1 in
|
||
let lit_u2 = PA.mk_lit u2 in
|
||
add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [ Lit.neg lit_t; lit_u1 ];
|
||
add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [ Lit.neg lit_t; lit_u2 ];
|
||
add_clause_lra_ (module PA) [ Lit.neg lit_u1; Lit.neg lit_u2; lit_t ]
|
||
)
|
||
| LRA_pred (pred, t1, t2) ->
|
||
let l1 = as_linexp t1 in
|
||
let l2 = as_linexp t2 in
|
||
let le = LE.(l1 - l2) in
|
||
let le_comb, le_const = LE.comb le, LE.const le in
|
||
let le_const = A.Q.neg le_const in
|
||
let op = s_op_of_pred pred in
|
||
|
||
(* now we have [le_comb op le_const] *)
|
||
|
||
(* obtain a single variable for the linear combination *)
|
||
let v, c_v = le_comb_to_singleton_ self le_comb in
|
||
declare_term_to_cc ~sub:false v;
|
||
LE_.Comb.iter (fun v _ -> declare_term_to_cc ~sub:true v) le_comb;
|
||
|
||
(* turn into simplex constraint. For example,
|
||
[c . v <= const] becomes a direct simplex constraint [v <= const/c]
|
||
(beware the sign) *)
|
||
|
||
(* make sure to swap sides if multiplying with a negative coeff *)
|
||
let q = A.Q.(le_const / c_v) in
|
||
let op =
|
||
if A.Q.(c_v < zero) then
|
||
S_op.neg_sign op
|
||
else
|
||
op
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
let lit = PA.mk_lit t in
|
||
let constr = SimpSolver.Constraint.mk v op q in
|
||
SimpSolver.declare_bound self.simplex constr (Tag.Lit lit);
|
||
Term.Tbl.add self.simp_preds t (v, op, q);
|
||
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.preproc@ :t %a@ :to-constr %a@])" Term.pp_debug t
|
||
SimpSolver.Constraint.pp constr)
|
||
| LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
|
||
if not (Term.Tbl.mem self.simp_defined t) then (
|
||
(* we define these terms so their value in the model make sense *)
|
||
let le = as_linexp t in
|
||
Term.Tbl.add self.simp_defined t le
|
||
)
|
||
| LRA_const _n -> ()
|
||
| LRA_other t when A.has_ty_real t -> ()
|
||
| LRA_other _ -> ()
|
||
|
||
let simplify (self : state) (_recurse : _) (t : Term.t) :
|
||
(Term.t * Proof_step.id Iter.t) option =
|
||
let proof_eq t u =
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step self.proof @@ fun () ->
|
||
Proof_rules.lemma_lra [ Lit.atom self.tst (Term.eq self.tst t u) ]
|
||
in
|
||
let proof_bool t ~sign:b =
|
||
let lit = Lit.atom ~sign:b self.tst t in
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step self.proof @@ fun () -> Proof_rules.lemma_lra [ lit ]
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_op _ | LRA_mult _ ->
|
||
let le = as_linexp t in
|
||
if LE.is_const le then (
|
||
let c = LE.const le in
|
||
let u = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const c) in
|
||
let pr = proof_eq t u in
|
||
Some (u, Iter.return pr)
|
||
) else (
|
||
let u = t_of_linexp self le in
|
||
if t != u then (
|
||
let pr = proof_eq t u in
|
||
Some (u, Iter.return pr)
|
||
) else
|
||
None
|
||
)
|
||
| LRA_pred ((Eq | Neq), _, _) ->
|
||
(* never change equalities, it can affect theory combination *)
|
||
None
|
||
| LRA_pred (pred, l1, l2) ->
|
||
let le = LE.(as_linexp l1 - as_linexp l2) in
|
||
|
||
if LE.is_const le then (
|
||
let c = LE.const le in
|
||
let is_true =
|
||
match pred with
|
||
| Leq -> A.Q.(c <= zero)
|
||
| Geq -> A.Q.(c >= zero)
|
||
| Lt -> A.Q.(c < zero)
|
||
| Gt -> A.Q.(c > zero)
|
||
| Eq -> A.Q.(c = zero)
|
||
| Neq -> A.Q.(c <> zero)
|
||
in
|
||
let u = Term.bool_val self.tst is_true in
|
||
let pr = proof_bool t ~sign:is_true in
|
||
Some (u, Iter.return pr)
|
||
) else (
|
||
(* le <= const *)
|
||
let u =
|
||
A.mk_lra self.tst
|
||
(LRA_pred
|
||
( pred,
|
||
t_of_comb self (LE.comb le) ~init:(t_zero self),
|
||
t_const self (A.Q.neg @@ LE.const le) ))
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
if t != u then (
|
||
let pr = proof_eq t u in
|
||
Some (u, Iter.return pr)
|
||
) else
|
||
None
|
||
)
|
||
| _ -> None
|
||
|
||
(* raise conflict from certificate *)
|
||
let fail_with_cert (self : state) si acts cert : 'a =
|
||
Profile.with1 "lra.simplex.check-cert" SimpSolver._check_cert cert;
|
||
let confl =
|
||
SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.lits cert
|
||
|> CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si)
|
||
|> List.rev_map Lit.neg
|
||
in
|
||
let pr =
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step (SI.proof si) @@ fun () ->
|
||
Proof_rules.lemma_lra confl
|
||
in
|
||
Stat.incr self.n_conflict;
|
||
SI.raise_conflict si acts confl pr
|
||
|
||
let on_propagate_ self si acts lit ~reason =
|
||
match lit with
|
||
| Tag.Lit lit ->
|
||
(* TODO: more detailed proof certificate *)
|
||
Stat.incr self.n_propagate;
|
||
SI.propagate si acts lit ~reason:(fun () ->
|
||
let lits = CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si) reason in
|
||
let pr =
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step (SI.proof si) @@ fun () ->
|
||
Proof_rules.lemma_lra (lit :: lits)
|
||
in
|
||
CCList.flat_map (Tag.to_lits si) reason, pr)
|
||
| _ -> ()
|
||
|
||
(** Check satisfiability of simplex, and sets [self.last_res] *)
|
||
let check_simplex_ self si acts : SimpSolver.Subst.t =
|
||
Log.debugf 5 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.check-simplex@ :n-vars %d :n-rows %d@])"
|
||
(SimpSolver.n_vars self.simplex)
|
||
(SimpSolver.n_rows self.simplex));
|
||
let res =
|
||
Profile.with_ "lra.simplex.solve" @@ fun () ->
|
||
SimpSolver.check self.simplex ~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ self si acts)
|
||
in
|
||
Log.debug 5 "(lra.check-simplex.done)";
|
||
self.last_res <- Some res;
|
||
match res with
|
||
| SimpSolver.Sat m -> m
|
||
| SimpSolver.Unsat cert ->
|
||
Log.debugf 10 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.check.unsat@ :cert %a@])" SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.pp cert);
|
||
fail_with_cert self si acts cert
|
||
|
||
(* TODO: trivial propagations *)
|
||
|
||
let add_local_eq_t (self : state) si acts t1 t2 ~tag : unit =
|
||
Log.debugf 20 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.add-local-eq@ %a@ %a@])" Term.pp_debug t1 Term.pp_debug t2);
|
||
reset_res_ self;
|
||
let t1, t2 =
|
||
if Term.compare t1 t2 > 0 then
|
||
t2, t1
|
||
else
|
||
t1, t2
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
let le = LE.(as_linexp t1 - as_linexp t2) in
|
||
let le_comb, le_const = LE.comb le, LE.const le in
|
||
let le_const = A.Q.neg le_const in
|
||
|
||
if LE_.Comb.is_empty le_comb then (
|
||
if A.Q.(le_const <> zero) then (
|
||
(* [c=0] when [c] is not 0 *)
|
||
let lit = Lit.atom ~sign:false self.tst @@ Term.eq self.tst t1 t2 in
|
||
let pr =
|
||
Proof_trace.add_step self.proof @@ fun () ->
|
||
Proof_rules.lemma_lra [ lit ]
|
||
in
|
||
SI.add_clause_permanent si acts [ lit ] pr
|
||
)
|
||
) else (
|
||
let v = var_encoding_comb ~pre:"le_local_eq" self le_comb in
|
||
try
|
||
let c1 = SimpSolver.Constraint.geq v le_const in
|
||
SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex c1 tag
|
||
~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ self si acts);
|
||
let c2 = SimpSolver.Constraint.leq v le_const in
|
||
SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex c2 tag
|
||
~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ self si acts)
|
||
with SimpSolver.E_unsat cert -> fail_with_cert self si acts cert
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
let add_local_eq (self : state) si acts n1 n2 : unit =
|
||
let t1 = E_node.term n1 in
|
||
let t2 = E_node.term n2 in
|
||
add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.CC_eq (n1, n2))
|
||
|
||
(* evaluate a term directly, as a variable *)
|
||
let eval_in_subst_ subst t =
|
||
match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const n -> n
|
||
| _ -> Subst.eval subst t |> Option.value ~default:A.Q.zero
|
||
|
||
(* evaluate a linear expression *)
|
||
let eval_le_in_subst_ subst (le : LE.t) = LE.eval (eval_in_subst_ subst) le
|
||
|
||
(* FIXME: rework into model creation
|
||
let do_th_combination (self : state) _si _acts : _ Iter.t =
|
||
Log.debug 1 "(lra.do-th-combinations)";
|
||
let model =
|
||
match self.last_res with
|
||
| Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) -> m
|
||
| _ -> assert false
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
let vals = Subst.to_iter model |> Term.Tbl.of_iter in
|
||
|
||
(* also include terms that occur under function symbols, if they're
|
||
not in the model already *)
|
||
Term.Tbl.iter
|
||
(fun t () ->
|
||
if not (Term.Tbl.mem vals t) then (
|
||
let v = eval_in_subst_ model t in
|
||
Term.Tbl.add vals t v
|
||
))
|
||
self.needs_th_combination;
|
||
|
||
(* also consider subterms that are linear expressions,
|
||
and evaluate them using the value of each variable
|
||
in that linear expression. For example a term [a + 2b]
|
||
is evaluated as [eval(a) + 2 × eval(b)]. *)
|
||
Term.Tbl.iter
|
||
(fun t le ->
|
||
if not (Term.Tbl.mem vals t) then (
|
||
let v = eval_le_in_subst_ model le in
|
||
Term.Tbl.add vals t v
|
||
))
|
||
self.simp_defined;
|
||
|
||
(* return whole model *)
|
||
Term.Tbl.to_iter vals |> Iter.map (fun (t, v) -> t, t_const self v)
|
||
*)
|
||
|
||
let add_trail_lit_ ~changed self si acts (lit : Lit.t) : unit =
|
||
let sign = Lit.sign lit in
|
||
let lit_t = Lit.term lit in
|
||
match Term.Tbl.get self.simp_preds lit_t, A.view_as_lra lit_t with
|
||
| Some (v, op, q), _ ->
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.partial-check.add@ :lit %a@ :lit-t %a@])" Lit.pp lit
|
||
Term.pp_debug lit_t);
|
||
|
||
(* need to account for the literal's sign *)
|
||
let op =
|
||
if sign then
|
||
op
|
||
else
|
||
S_op.not_ op
|
||
in
|
||
|
||
(* assert new constraint to Simplex *)
|
||
let constr = SimpSolver.Constraint.mk v op q in
|
||
Log.debugf 10 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.partial-check.assert@ %a@])" SimpSolver.Constraint.pp constr);
|
||
changed := true;
|
||
(try
|
||
SimpSolver.add_var self.simplex v;
|
||
SimpSolver.add_constraint self.simplex constr (Tag.Lit lit)
|
||
~on_propagate:(on_propagate_ self si acts)
|
||
with SimpSolver.E_unsat cert ->
|
||
Log.debugf 10 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.partial-check.unsat@ :cert %a@])"
|
||
SimpSolver.Unsat_cert.pp cert);
|
||
fail_with_cert self si acts cert)
|
||
| None, LRA_pred (Eq, t1, t2) when sign ->
|
||
add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.Lit lit)
|
||
| None, LRA_pred (Neq, t1, t2) when not sign ->
|
||
add_local_eq_t self si acts t1 t2 ~tag:(Tag.Lit lit)
|
||
| None, _ -> ()
|
||
|
||
(* partial checks is where we add literals from the trail to the
|
||
simplex. *)
|
||
let partial_check_ self si acts trail : unit =
|
||
Profile.with_ "lra.partial-check" @@ fun () ->
|
||
reset_res_ self;
|
||
let changed = ref false in
|
||
|
||
Iter.iter (add_trail_lit_ self si acts ~changed) trail;
|
||
|
||
(* incremental check *)
|
||
if !changed then ignore (check_simplex_ self si acts : SimpSolver.Subst.t);
|
||
()
|
||
|
||
let final_check_ (self : state) si (acts : SI.theory_actions)
|
||
(trail : _ Iter.t) : unit =
|
||
Log.debug 5 "(th-lra.final-check)";
|
||
Profile.with_ "lra.final-check" @@ fun () ->
|
||
reset_res_ self;
|
||
|
||
let changed = ref false in
|
||
Iter.iter (add_trail_lit_ ~changed self si acts) trail;
|
||
|
||
(* add equalities between linear-expressions merged in the congruence closure *)
|
||
ST_exprs.iter_all self.st_exprs (fun (_, l) ->
|
||
Iter.diagonal_l l (fun (s1, s2) -> add_local_eq self si acts s1.n s2.n));
|
||
|
||
(* TODO: jiggle model to reduce the number of variables that
|
||
have the same value *)
|
||
let model = check_simplex_ self si acts in
|
||
Log.debugf 20 (fun k -> k "(@[lra.model@ %a@])" SimpSolver.Subst.pp model);
|
||
Log.debug 5 "(lra: solver returns SAT)";
|
||
()
|
||
|
||
(* help generating model *)
|
||
let model_ask_ (self : state) _si _model (t : Term.t) : _ option =
|
||
let res =
|
||
match self.last_res with
|
||
| Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) ->
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k -> k "(@[lra.model-ask@ %a@])" Term.pp_debug t);
|
||
(match A.view_as_lra t with
|
||
| LRA_const n -> Some n (* always eval constants to themselves *)
|
||
| _ -> SimpSolver.V_map.get t m)
|
||
|> Option.map (fun t -> t_const self t, [])
|
||
| _ -> None
|
||
in
|
||
match res with
|
||
| Some _ -> res
|
||
| None when A.has_ty_real t ->
|
||
(* last resort: return 0 *)
|
||
(* NOTE: this should go away maybe? no term should escape the LRA model… *)
|
||
Log.debugf 0 (fun k -> k "MODEL TY REAL DEFAULT %a" Term.pp t);
|
||
let zero = A.mk_lra self.tst (LRA_const A.Q.zero) in
|
||
Some (zero, [])
|
||
| None -> None
|
||
|
||
(* help generating model *)
|
||
let model_complete_ (self : state) _si ~add : unit =
|
||
Log.debugf 30 (fun k -> k "(lra.model-complete)");
|
||
match self.last_res with
|
||
| Some (SimpSolver.Sat m) when Term.Tbl.length self.in_model > 0 ->
|
||
Log.debugf 50 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.in_model@ %a@])"
|
||
(Util.pp_iter Term.pp_debug)
|
||
(Term.Tbl.keys self.in_model));
|
||
|
||
let add_t t () =
|
||
match SimpSolver.V_map.get t m with
|
||
| None -> ()
|
||
| Some u -> add t (t_const self u)
|
||
in
|
||
Term.Tbl.iter add_t self.in_model
|
||
| _ -> ()
|
||
|
||
let k_state = SMT.Registry.create_key ()
|
||
|
||
let create_and_setup ~id si =
|
||
Log.debug 2 "(th-lra.setup)";
|
||
let st = create ~th_id:id si in
|
||
SMT.Registry.set (SI.registry si) k_state st;
|
||
SI.add_simplifier si (simplify st);
|
||
SI.on_preprocess si (preproc_lra st);
|
||
SI.on_final_check si (final_check_ st);
|
||
(* SI.on_partial_check si (partial_check_ st); *)
|
||
SI.on_model si ~ask:(model_ask_ st) ~complete:(model_complete_ st);
|
||
SI.claim_sort si ~th_id:id ~ty:(A.ty_real (SI.tst si));
|
||
SI.on_cc_pre_merge si (fun (_cc, n1, n2, expl) ->
|
||
match as_const_ (E_node.term n1), as_const_ (E_node.term n2) with
|
||
| Some q1, Some q2 when A.Q.(q1 <> q2) ->
|
||
(* classes with incompatible constants *)
|
||
Log.debugf 30 (fun k ->
|
||
k "(@[lra.merge-incompatible-consts@ %a@ %a@])" E_node.pp n1
|
||
E_node.pp n2);
|
||
Error (CC.Handler_action.Conflict expl)
|
||
| _ -> Ok []);
|
||
st
|
||
|
||
let theory =
|
||
SMT.Solver.mk_theory ~name:"th-lra" ~create_and_setup ~push_level
|
||
~pop_levels ()
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
let theory (module A : ARG) : SMT.theory =
|
||
let module M = Make (A) in
|
||
M.theory
|